ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To analyze the grouping effect and composition of hospitalization costs for cases of patients with malignant proliferative disease under the diagnosis-related group （DRG） payment system， as well as any changes， in order to provide a basis for medical institutions to improve DRG payment-related measures， control drug costs， and for relevant departments to make decisions. METHODS The data of patients with malignant proliferative disease cases were collected from a “Third Grade Class A” hospital in 2021 and 2022， and the variation coefficient （CV） was used to evaluate the grouping of DRG. The structural variation degree and the new grey correlation analysis were used to study the structural variation of hospitalization cost and the correlation degree between the hospitalization cost and the cost of other items. RESULTS The overall reduction in variance （RIV） for the DRG group of patients with malignant proliferative disease was 79.36%； the CV of other groups were all lower than one except that the RW21 group was 1.09. Compared with 2021， the hospitalization cost for patients with malignant proliferative disease in 2022 decreased by 17.80%， and the decreases in management fees and drug costs were 32.15% and 21.30%， respectively， while the per capita medical expenses increased by 17.26%. The new grey correlation degree of drug cost decreased， but that of medical expenses increased. CONCLUSIONS Under the DRG payment system， hospitalization costs for patients with malignant proliferative disease in the sample hospital decrease， but the grouping efficiency of RW21 and other disease groups needs improvement， and the cost structure needs optimization.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE：To provide reference for improving medical insurance reimbursement for multi-indication drugs based on value-based pricing in China. METHODS：The theory and practice of value-based pricing for multi-indication drugs were sorted out，and the value standards and medical insurance reimbursement strategies based on value-based pricing in France，Germany，UK，Italy and Sweden were analyzed，so as to provide the suggestions for medical insurance reimbursement of multi-indication drugs in China. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS：The realization of value-based pricing first needed to develop a value framework to define，measure and integrate value，and then established a model to convert the total value into price. The overall idea of value-based pricing for multi-indication drugs was consistent，but there were differences in the value standard. In the UK and Sweden， quality-adjusted life years （QALYs） and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios （ICERs） measured by pharmacoeconomicsare used as the value standard. France，Germany and Italy were more focused on the therapeutic value and clinical benefit improvement. As for medical insurance reimbursement strategies，France adopted single weighting method based on expected volume. Germany adopted combination weighting method based on value and volume. UK introduced the Patient Access Schemes and Italy introduced the Managed Entry reements，both based on the nominal reimbursement standard. Sweden adopted independent reimbursement for different indications by different brand names. It is suggested that China can explore the value-based pricing strategies of multi-indication drugs on the basis of the above international experiences，reference and use these variety of medical insurance reimbursement strategies comprehensively. Simultaneously，the information collection mechanism of patients and drug use should be improved to provide data support for the implementation of China’s value-based pricing and reimbursement strategies for multi-indication drugs.